There was a story run in the DomPost last week about cyclists coming off their bikes in Pukeahu National War Memorial Park because of poor visibility of the kerbs. It’s a bit of a design flaw that’s only coming to light now that real people are interacting with the park. I’m sure we’ll find more issues as we go.
“It’s supposed to be a cycling and walking-friendly place, so you don’t expect to come across something like that,” group committee member Alastair Smith said.
He first noticed the low kerbs when he crashed off his bike last November, before the Pukeahu National War Memorial Park was finished. He was riding on the north side of the road through thepark, and had to move around a parked car.
He did not see the kerb, clipped it with his wheel and came off, injuring only his pride.
The problems stemmed from the kerbs being only 50 millimetres high, and being hard to distinguish from the road and cobbles, especially after rain.
As I was walking through the park today, I was drawn to the fact that the roads have been given an inconsistent treatment. Cobbles are featured on Buckle Street up to the memorial access and smooth asphalt on the connector between Tory and Tasman.
I happen to have a serious issue with the traffic speeds that can be obtained on the through road, and it’s part of the same problem as the kerbs. With only 50mm kerbs, the raised table isn’t enough of a feature to force fast traffic to slow. The narrow road is meant to encourage lower speeds, but I’ve seen a few vehicles cutting though in the range of 50km/h.
The roads highlights in red are normal asphalt, yellow are raised tables and blue are cobblestones. I’ve marked up the photo from memory, so I may have gotten some details wrong. The cobblestones do a good job of reminding motorists that they are in a low speed place. With the 50mm kerbs, the raised table on the link road is pretty useless. This is contrary to the plan put forward by NZTA (PDF):
What should have happened was for the Tory/Tasman link to be cobblestone. I’d expect that the current raised table may need to be left as-is to allow for people with disabilities requiring a smooth pedestrian surface to cross safely.
Returning to the issue of kerb visibility, the DomPost article had indicated that even with cobblestones, the kerb wasn’t clear. While this is quite true, the implications of the surface texture can be quickly learned. I doubt many people would make the same mistake twice.
In the above photo, there’s no difference in surface texture between the footpath and the road. A cyclist would very easily miss the visual cue and not notice the 50mm drop.
This photo shows a clear delineation between footpath and road. It would be hard to not notice the boundary between the two.
Interestingly, the west end of Buckle St is paved in asphalt instead of cobblestone. Along that section, which I failed to photograph, they’ve added a physical barrier between the footpath and the road as a trial measure. I’m willing to bet that if the roads were consistently paved, this wouldn’t be as much of an issue.
Alliance manager Duncan Kenderdine said the small kerb enhanced the open feel of the park, but accepted that problems had been raised about it.
The alliance was aware the white line solution was not sufficient. “We are now reviewing the options around physical changes to reduce people meandering across the kerb, or ways of levelling the kerb by cambering or adjusting levels beside it.”
There were plans to talk to those who had been affected about what the best solution might be, he said.
I wouldn’t suggest that putting cobblestones along the roads in a consistent fashion would solve all the problems with the park, but it should provide necessary visual cues while slowing traffic.
That just leaves us with things like this: